In our dialogue about the existence of God this morning (Newstalk 93, Jamaica) my friend Lloyd D’Aguilar a professing atheist repeated some notions that are downright false even though propounded by reputable scientists. I am summarizing the essence of the false ideas and not necessarily quoting Lloyd or any scientist (unless otherwise indicated).

False Idea #1- Given millions or billions of years matter can generate almost anything.
The flaw here is that time is treated…

There is arguably no greater ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ evidence for the existence of a personal intelligent God than the presence and pervasiveness of biological information in all living things.
Ponder the testimony of atheistic Biologist Richard Dawkins on the nature of biological information
“…at the molecular genetic level, every single one of more than a trillion cells in the body contains about a thousand times as much precisely-coded digital information as my entire computer…” (The…

“The heavens declare nothing really, the firmament showeth nothing really, day unto day uttereth nothing really and night unto night showeth nothing really.  There is no speech or language from them, full stop, end of pre-scientific rubbish.”
Such would be a possible rewording of Psalm 19 in the hands of the so-called ‘New Atheists’ like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, all of whom are militant atheists who reject the argument from/to…

My response to the recent news of Stephen Hawking’s position re God is identical to my response to news years ago that the late Antony Flew that noted British Philosopher had abandoned atheism — intellectual disappointment that a world renowned scholar has not gone far enough in his reflections about God.
Flew, for scientific reasons, surrendered atheism, not for theism (belief in a personal-Infinite God) but for deism (belief in an impersonal ‘God of science’,…

Jehovah’s Witnesses (hereafter JWs) reject the deity of Jesus Christ despite the fact that the New Testament is replete with clear affirmations of the fact that Jesus is called God. We turn to that testimony now.
As a colleague pointed out to me, the JWs’ treatment of Jn. 1.1c as saying ‘Jesus is a god’ begs the question ‘what kind of god is he?’
If he is being affirmed as a false god then why…